Pressure of
IGCSE’s
A close friend of the family was
expected to receive high grades in his GCSEs. As the courses drew to a close,
the pressure to succeed intensified from his teachers and parents. Barry became
more withdrawn as the exams ominously approached. On the first week of exams,
rather than attend school, he chose the local ‘pitch and putt’ golf course.
Barry continued to do this until the school and his parents realised his
absence. He was given counselling and the opportunity to re-sit but the same
thing occurred for the second set of exams. The pressure was the main
contributor to Barry leaving school with no qualifications and a lengthy spell
in a psychiatric unit. This is just one of many people who have been effected
by the pressure of school exams and each year the pressure increases causing
students to feel the strain. Is it really worth putting students through exams for
qualifications if the side effect is Mental Illness and Stress…
In the U.K. GCSEs are a
compulsory academic qualification that school students aged 14-16 must take in their
chosen subjects and must include the core subjects of Maths, English and
Science. At the end of year 11 every student takes an end of course Examination.
The grades achieved by each individual student dictates their future, deciding
their next path academically, for example, sixth form college, University or
work. Without a ‘passing grade’, it is highly unlikely that the student can
continue into University and study further their chosen subject.
Universities are becoming highly
competitive with who they accept onto their courses; universities are looking
for unique, intelligent, academically high achievers to enter into their programmes.
Sixth form colleges are also becoming more selective on the students joining.
Entry requirements range from 4-5 GCSEs with grades A*- C, however selective
colleges would now like students with at least 6 A-grade GCSEs and as a result
of this competition, students feel the excessive pressure from peers to
achieve.
GCSEs are believed by some
educational specialists to be a good indicator of how well a student will
perform in further education. This belief is not held by everyone; it is
difficult to believe that with much research showing that humans have ‘multiple
intelligence’ every student should be judged similarly.
Another factor to consider is the
young age of students making subject choices and life decisions which will
affect the next sixty-seven and a half years of their lives. Making these
decisions will affect their pensions and their future generations place in
society, this may seem ridiculous, but the average life expectancy in the U.K
is presently 80.5 years.
Aged thirteen, a child is still
five years away from being able to vote, marry without consent or purchase a
mortgage. We would never consider to ask a thirteen year old to decide on a ‘life
partner’ and find it ridiculous that they financially tie themselves to a
property for the next twenty five years. If such a world existed, we would hope
that there would be a chance to re-consider their decisions but we do not even
allow children to change their subject choices for GCSEs. They have to
continue, there is no opportunity available to re-consider those decisions.
Aged fourteen, having studied for
a year, there is still no consideration for change. The only option is to deliberately
neglect a subject, causing a negative classroom situation or drop a subject,
both options leave a pupil with feelings of failure.
Other educationalists would argue
that a better solution is progressive testing of knowledge throughout the student’s
secondary school life. This enables an enriched understanding of where each
individual is growing academically. This way of learning is used successfully
throughout Europe and one such style is the International Baccalaureates MYP
programme. This way of learning does
mean that the students have more assessments yearly, however it is a favoured style
of education by students as they can change their end of year grade throughout the
course by improving their assessment grades, this makes the students on MYP
courses feel less stress and pressure. I believe that this style of education
should be used globally as student’s pressure levels and school suicide rates
increase annually.
The increase in pressure for exams is causing students to
become overwhelmed by stress, leading to mental illness in young people. A
charity called ‘Young Minds’ has a 24-hour helpline specifically for under
eighteens in the U.K. In 2010 they had reported six thousand three hundred and
three calls in that year from the six million children living in the U.K in
that year. However, 42% of those calls were about the topic of school and
coping with the pressure of the exams.
The fact that these
exams are causing people to be ill should indicate that something needs to be changed.
However, with teachers constantly telling students ‘you are going to fail if
you don’t pay attention’ or ‘there is no way you can pass at the rate you are
working’ is not helping. If these exams continue in the future then the least
that can be done, is to create a positive environment towards and around students.
Schools are supposed to be enriching the lives of young adults enabling them to
succeed, not applying a set of rules that only some pupils can use
successfully.
Hearing negative
comments, has a detrimental effect on working well, students instantly doubt
their own ability to perform well and gain top grades. Children have the right to
blossom and develop their individual special skills in areas were they excel,
but if we misguidedly focus purely exam grades we are losing the chance to
create a future generation of intelligent, unique, happy individuals. I believe
the way forward is to stop all the pressure of exams and to focus on developing
a wealth of individual talents.